Government Order (G.O.) 610, issued in 1985 by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, was significant in the context of local employment and representation in the state. The order aimed to ensure the implementation of job reservations for local residents, particularly focusing on the Mulki Rules.

Provisions of G.O. 610 (1985)

  1. Reservation of Jobs:

    • G.O. 610 mandated the reservation of 80% of government jobs for locals in districts that were part of the Telangana region. This provision was aimed at rectifying historical injustices faced by the local population in terms of employment opportunities.

  2. Implementation of Mulki Rules:

    • The order reinforced the need to implement the Mulki Rules effectively, which prioritized local residents in government employment and educational institutions.

  3. Local Definition:

    • It defined the criteria for identifying "locals," clarifying which individuals were eligible for job reservations based on their residence and domicile in the region.

  4. Monitoring and Compliance:

    • G.O. 610 also emphasized the establishment of a monitoring mechanism to ensure compliance with the job reservation provisions and to address grievances related to employment.

Violations of G.O. 610

  1. Lack of Implementation:

    • Over the years, there were numerous instances where the provisions of G.O. 610 were not implemented effectively. Reports indicated that the actual reservation percentages were often not met, leading to widespread discontent among the local population.

  2. Political Interference:

    • Allegations of political interference and favoritism in the recruitment processes often undermined the spirit of the order. This led to accusations that the job reservation provisions were being flouted for political gain.

  3. Legal Challenges:

    • The violation of G.O. 610 resulted in legal challenges and public protests, as many locals felt that their rights were being ignored. Activists and community leaders frequently called for stricter enforcement of the order and accountability for violations.

  4. Impact on Local Sentiments:

    • The failure to uphold the provisions of G.O. 610 contributed to growing frustrations and a sense of betrayal among the local population, further fueling the demand for a separate Telangana state.

Conclusion

G.O. 610 (1985) was a crucial step towards ensuring local representation and employment rights in Andhra Pradesh, particularly for the Telangana region. However, its ineffective implementation and subsequent violations created a backdrop of unrest and dissatisfaction, contributing to the larger movement for statehood in Telangana.